BitcoinIsFuture's avatar
BitcoinIsFuture 2 months ago
Well, the truth is you are not in favor of stopping spam and you are against fighting spam. See how well you describe Citrea use case - the futue spammers to put their spam into OP_RETURN and whoever wants to use inscriptions can continue do so ... But the fees? They haven't stopped spam, have they. Its actually increasing. And with BIP110 fees are still doing their work. image
BitcoinIsFuture's avatar BitcoinIsFuture
Majority of Core devs are not only compromised but their so called arguments have been complete bullshit. We already know that but now raw data from the blockchain proves it. It really shows when they (Citrea and their cucks) are trying to turn Bitcoin into an Ethereum like shitcoin. Core's V30 is a malware and an attack on Bitcoin. Spam on Bitcoin is just disgusting. Run Bitcoin Knots and support BIP110 because Bitcoin is Freedom Money. "The “blocks must be full” belief fails on (at least) three independent grounds: Empirically: Spam doesn’t meaningfully contribute to security budget. 36% of block space produces 1% of revenue. Fees are at 3.5-year lows despite massive increase in non-financial usage." https://renaudcuny.substack.com/p/issue-4-the-blocks-must-be-full-myth
View quoted note →

Replies (1)

sedited's avatar
sedited 2 months ago
> Its increasing There's not been a significant increase in usage of large op returns over the past half year. The utxo set has been steadily shrinking in the same time frame. The chart you showed seems to be measuring small op_returns too, which bip110 does not stop.