Vitor Pamplona's avatar
Vitor Pamplona _@vitorpamplona.com 4 months ago
Just read this entire conversation. You keep suggesting that nip44 did nip04 dirty even though it is clearly better. I have never seen you advocating *cleanly* for NIP-44. You always write as if you wanted NIP-04 back, which will never happen. I don't know why you do this, but you do. It's very clear. I think you like to have grudges and those trump any rational analysis on the debate.
↑ Parent

Replies (2)

semisol's avatar
semisol semisol@nostr.land 4 months ago
So your assumptions are automatically fact? Interesting. I do not want NIP-04 back and I have never stated that. But NIP-44 was rushed through based on false information, out of thin air, while important concerns that have existed for a long while (such as encryption intent) not being considered. That is what I have stated and what you keep trying to intentionally misinterpret as “wanting NIP-04 back”.
1 replies ↓
↑