The likelihood of having your passport/identification and/or physical address leaked. Both much more vulnerable to abuse than a bank transfer.

Genuine inquiry: since you're already handing over your private data by just sending us a transfer, why not go all the way and give up the rest with full verification? After all, what's a little more privacy invasion between friends?

If it's a matter of data leaks, the only thing I can tell you is that we only work with the highest quality partners. At the end of the day, we too are Bitcoiners and we choose the best possible alternative for us and our users

Imagine a "friend" invites you to a party and says: "Hey, you already gave me your address when we sent cards. So why don't you just let me into your house whenever I want? It's not like your privacy is important!" This analogy perfectly illustrates the issues with full Know Your Customer (KYC) processes by highlighting how intrusive and abusive such behavior can be. Here is an in-depth explanation of why companies should reject this practice and consider leaving a country where these measures are enforced, rather than simply complying and presenting it to people as if it’s not a big deal: 1. **Privacy and Trust**: - **Analogy**: The "friend" uses the existing confidentiality (address for cards) as justification to intrude further into the person’s privacy (permanent access to the house). - **Explanation**: Customers already share some information in good faith. Full KYC processes demand even deeper personal insights, which can erode customers' trust and sense of security. Companies have a responsibility to protect this trust rather than exploit it. 2. **Excessive Data Requests**: - **Analogy**: The "friend" demands extensive access (permanent house access) that is unnecessary for the original interaction (sending cards). - **Explanation**: Companies should limit themselves to the minimum necessary data. Full KYC requirements often go beyond what is necessary for the service or transaction, making them a needless burden and invasion. 3. **Security Risks**: - **Analogy**: By giving the "friend" permanent access to the house, the risk of security issues increases. - **Explanation**: Collecting and storing comprehensive personal data makes companies attractive targets for cyberattacks. A data breach could have catastrophic impacts on customers whose data falls into the wrong hands. 4. **Government Pressure and Compliance Costs**: - **Analogy**: The "friend" might be motivated by external pressure (hypothetically from an overreaching organization) to demand more access. - **Explanation**: Strict KYC regulations are often imposed by government authorities. Companies need to invest substantial resources to comply with these regulations, leading to higher operating costs and reduced focus on core competencies. 5. **Ethics and Corporate Values**: - **Analogy**: The "friend" ignores basic principles of respect and privacy. - **Explanation**: Companies that uphold ethical principles should oppose practices perceived as invasive or abusive. They should prioritize their corporate values over short-term compliance. 6. **Competitiveness and Responsibility**: - **Analogy**: The "friend" dismissively says the request is "not a big deal," disregarding the other person’s feelings. - **Explanation**: Companies that take the protection of customer data seriously can differentiate themselves through their safe and responsible handling of personal data. They have a responsibility toward their customers that goes beyond mere legal compliance. Ultimately, it is often more beneficial for a company to consider relocating rather than operating in a market that enforces excessive privacy intrusions. Customers appreciate transparent and respectful treatment. Companies should uphold these values to foster long-term trust and loyalty.

These analogies arw great.

I don't like like KYC either, but it's not a solution to just say "relocate to another country". It's not how business work. We also cannot serve EU without license

The difference is that you have advertised that you are a service where you don't have to upload photos of your ID and don't have to hold your head up to the camera. Now that's no longer supposed to make a difference! You're spinning like a flag in the wind.