Bitcoiners: The network is censorship resistant. Somehow also Bitcoiners: Let’s figure out how we can best filter “undesirable transactions”.

Replies (4)

I'm on the knots side. The only argument that makes sense for me from Core is that in the future when everyone is using lightning and the block reward is near 0, miners will need people wanting to store photos. But everything else I disagree. Also I heard that core is maintained by people paid by some corporation with interests.
I mean if you send 1sat to an inexistent pub key (invalid key that doesn't match the algorithm to be a pub key, check-sum or whatever) come on, this is spam
i hate this retarded bs, but there is a difference between limitations on form and limitations on content, specifically as in who is the sender or the receiver. limiting form (what shape transactions can take) is not censorship. trying to exclude certain people with different values is.