If you question dev decisions you're as bad as Craig Wright. This discussion has hit a new low point.
nostr:nevent1qqszsfxxzcxgm30rdf9s7fyc4lw0pgfpj8p8vchczqv4rcngwajdntqpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqzyzrgt6l0vefn3htfx83veheur8vlpedpqe7frrezuuypcf2clra0sqcyqqqqqqgqsyw58
Login to reply
Replies (8)
Endless emotional blackmail and logical fallacies used by the Dev supporters. These people are disgusting
"If you disagree with us you're as bad as Craig Wright." - Sjors Provost
Nobody has mentioned anything about legal actions or forcing anyone. He's got some delusional fantasy or victim complex going on. Such a dishonest tactic that only serves to ignore legitimate criticism. It's really disgusting.
One has to wonder are the Devs so low IQ and corrupt as their communication makes out or it's a deliberate tactic. I mean, I find it hard to believe such arrogance.. perhaps totally ego driven and as Shinobi said, he's fully jabbed..
That's not what he said though, so it's a bit of a strawman argument you're making. Why? 🤔
I suggest to anyone reading this, go read Sjors post and assess for yourself if I'm straw manning. So what's your point, he didn't say exactly those words? Maybe you can explain the point he was trying to make with CSW, and how it's different from what I said in any meaningful way.
He said Bitcoin core devs don't have any fiduciary duty to the Bitcoin network but some bitcoiners feel entitled to tell him and the core devs what to do like they are errand boys.
Which is what Craig wright did before he went full litigious, so it's a bit of a strawman.
Yep, like I said, Sorjs thinks criticism of core is as bad as what CSW did. Glad we're on the same page. But where's the bit of a strawman? Can you walk me through it without just restating what he said? Either you're confused by the concept of paraphrasing, or you're being pedantic.