The fact that I said "you don't need to be an economist to see this" and you read it as "economics is irrelevant" shows your reading comprehension
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Im saying that not understanding economics is why your argument isnt compelling. You dont need to understand ANYTHING to see it as you do. In fact, you have to understand very little to see it that way lol
"not understanding economics is why your argument isn't compelling"
I challenge you to find a proof somewhere in economics that contradicts my argument