I agree. The algorithms were designed to increase engagement. As often happens, I don’t think this was done with bad intentions, but it had bad consequences because the thought is incomplete.
The easiest way to get people to engage is to get them angry. This is true here like it is anywhere. I can post something a little rage-baity, and it will get more responses. Unfortunately, the algorithms didn’t take that into account. And it’s hard to undo something making the stockholders millions once it’s done.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
I do believe it was intentionally done as such.
Behaviorism is not only for the laboratory.
It is applied to condition people in work environment as much as general consumption, be it for products or services.
Manipulating online reactions is part of their game.
But hatred is also a passion.
Origen had it so indifference is the opposite of love, not hatred; as love and hatred are both emotions.
Hence why Origen would say Hell is cold, as it is far from God's Love.
In general, hatred does not bode well here. Melancholy, perhaps. Being drawn to some difficulties one goes through in life.
But from what I have witnessed, people would rather get away from ongoing drama as soon as possible, right? The bad impressions will linger though.