So a bunch of little governments everywhere. Lol That's even worse than what we have now. That can't work without an ultimate arbiter. You essentially end up with the warlords that result anytime anarchy actually occurs. There is no actual anarchy in the real world. Humans will always form governments because there will always be humans that don't play by the fantasy rules. Should government be extremely limited? Yes. But having none with this many people is just fucking retarded. We still have rape, murder and theft even with a government. That isn't going to magically go away by having a bunch of micro groups all over doing things their own way. And there will always be groups looking to grow and impose their ways.

Replies (3)

It's just about consent and private property. it's not about government. there's no reason a group of people couldn't organize a government-like thing for _themselves_ for the sake of coherence. As long as members are free to Exit if they so choose, it's not a State.
This, and it's happened many, many times in many, many places. Mises.org has papers. People can negotiate responsibilities, rules and processes for dispute resolution perfectly well without a monopoly State.