one I'm entertaining your AI slop for the sake of conversation. but I don't really believe it knows wtf it's talking about or accept it as a convincing argument. two you repeatedly gloss over the fact Bitcoin miners are known and visible. they are public and operating. speaking about *potential hash* in data centers is not the same thing. that hash has to be acquired and brought online. these are not the same thing and it isn't particularly useful to compare them as if they were. you want to talk as if bitcoins active, known, centralized hash can't be effected by well understood and straightforward regulatory pressure. but somehow it's trivial for an adversary to bring online against monero *somebody else's compute* that is already being used for profit in another way. so even if we accept that the AIs numbers are correct, and I don't, they aren't directly comparable at all, as they aren't a measure of anything that can be called "decentralization"