JuAnHu's avatar
JuAnHu 1 month ago
The Nutri score is a RELATIVE score comparing products from the same category. There's higher score pizzas and lower score pizzas. But you cannot compare the pizza score to the honey score. I agree that the scoring system has very limited usefulness. In the end, your whole diet is what counts, not individual meals.

Replies (4)

Default avatar
LolaL 1 month ago
honey is probably compared with maple sirup or agave sirup, i guess. Cheese is compared with other cheese. Sunflower seeds are compared with other seeds. And so on…
Default avatar
LolaL 1 month ago
I think, it would make sense to have a label wich clarifys high and low processed food next to the nutri score or even better combine the processing level and the nutriscore (like itβ€˜s now) and make a health score out of it.
JuAnHu's avatar
JuAnHu 1 month ago
How would you define the level of "processed food"? Some processing is good and necessary. Some processing not so good. The quantification is even more difficult. In general, I wouldn't rely on any of such scores. My approach is: 1) I look at the ingredient list, which already tells a lot. 2) I assess the food quality with my own senses, if possible. Although sometimes color can be misleading. 3) The more bullshit bingo is printed on the packaging, the less likely I buy it. It takes a bit of experience but over time you get the drill.
↑