Instead of more clients/features/infra/whatever, there needs to be more things developed long-term and focused on stability.
The state of Nostr usability has barely improved pre and post AI slop, if anything it got worse.
Login to reply
Replies (5)
I'm shocked. SHOCKED. To hear someone else say it. I thought I was the only one.
How about a readable spec that tells you what a Nostr client is and is modular enough to change interactions and functionality?
a base off of which to build, instead of having everyone implement their own version and kinds and so forth.
What if instead of misinterpretable hand-wavey specs, we had concrete implementations in code of the core functionality? We might even package this up into an easy to use thing, which we could call a library.
But the UI is still very problematic. So we also make a base UI. Then, why bother with people reimplementing their own thing all the time? We add 99% of the functions everyone needs into the base UI.
You have built a client
Isnt the nostr sdk exactly this?
I'm with you about building a library but after that, UI is completely function dependent. So, I'm not sure hard coding a UI is a good idea.