How does separating money and state, depend on*checks notes* the state passing the CLARITY Act? What am I missing here? The confusion that some in this space have is absolutely astonishing to say the least. If your coin, whatever it is, is dependent on some nonagenarians in Congress passing a bill, then it's been captured by the state. Plain and simple.

Replies (7)

I am working on a full escape plan and believe there are better ways to move into what's next. And a way from them. The more people we break the programming on the more we can build something new. Because the spell people speak on is a program that's running in the background that someone's got a check engine light and they don't know how to check what's running them in the background. I don't have any thought on this though. Other than they have no care for us. And I have no care for their abusive laws.
I posted something earlier today in a post. THE NUMBERS BEHIND THE NOTICE There is no single number of people who must agree for an appeal to be valid. But the number matters โ€” depending on what you're trying to do. ๐Ÿ“œ Declaration of Independence โ€” Moral Authority No specific number required. It appeals to "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God" and the "consent of the governed." What it requires: a "long train of abuses" and a "design to reduce them under absolute Despotism." How you use it: a moral and philosophical argument. The agreement comes from a mass movement of people recognizing that the government has become destructive. โš–๏ธ Article V โ€” Constitutional Convention (Legal Path) You need two-thirds (34) of state legislatures to submit identical applications to Congress. Current status: roughly 20 states have passed such resolutions. You'd need 14 more. Once 34 states apply, Congress must call a convention. Any amendments proposed would then need to be ratified by three-fourths (38) of the states. ๐Ÿ“ Government Petitions โ€” Bureaucratic Path U.S. White House: 100,000 signatures in 30 days for an official response. UK Parliament: 10,000 signatures for a government response; 100,000 for a parliamentary debate. A Critical Note The Declaration gives you the right to alter or abolish a destructive government. Scripture (like Matthew 18:6) gives you the warning against causing the little ones to stumble. But these two frameworks serve different purposes. ยท The Declaration justifies political revolution. ยท Scripture condemns spiritual failure. To be effective, use the Declaration's logic to argue for political change โ€” and Scripture to argue for the moral necessity of that change. But here's what I need you to hear: Without the three things I'm speaking on โ€” astrology, emotions, and Scripture โ€” the Declaration is just a document. When you bring astrology into it, you see your purpose. When you bring emotions into it, you heal. When you bring Scripture into it, you have the standard. And without those three things, people won't truly look at what's happening. They'll stay asleep. They'll stay controlled. And here's the other thing you need to know: This is also the evidence against them. The Declaration. Scripture. The laws they created that cause the little ones to stumble. The systems that protect abusers and silence survivors. The misuse of the text to control instead of free. It's all being documented. Every article. Every chart. Every Scripture test. Every post. The evidence is being gathered. And when it's time โ€” it will be presented. Not in anger. Not in vengeance. In truth. You do not need a specific number to speak the truth. You only need a specific number to legally compel a government response. But to wake people up โ€” you need the three things. And to hold them accountable โ€” you need the evidence. Astrology. Emotions. Scripture. The New Spirit. And the evidence.
โ†‘