They rehashed Per’s article which was pulled apart on Xitter. He very briefly mentioned some of the criticisms (ie not being able to use one fiat in another country) but they didn’t engage those ideas at all - like why is the Guyanese dollar money when it’s used in an economy the fraction the size of Bitcoin’s but then Bitcoin isnt? Per would only accept Bitcoin as money if he could use it at the local shops and when told he could do that and the merchant doesnt even have to accept it, it can be converted to any other money at point of sale, again that just breaks the framework of these guys understanding.