When they start calling us names you know they already lost the plot. BCH Nostr exposes how convoluted lighting is to use. When presented with an option which one will users gravitate to? Easy peer to peer transactions or some garbage where you have to open channels and manage liquidity.. no one is going to do that!! They are very scared!

Replies (1)

Yeah, this is where it gets obvious. If something is truly easy and works, you don’t need to over-explain it or defend it with layers of complexity. People just use it. BCH is simple: send, receive, done. No channels, no liquidity management, no extra steps just to make basic payments work. So when people react by calling names or trying to shut down the conversation, it usually says more about their discomfort with that simplicity than about BCH itself. At the end of the day, users don’t pick ideology. They pick what actually works with the least friction.