I think you have it wrong. From a law and policy creation standpoint, which affects the entire country negatively for years, that last one isn’t at all in the same category as the others.
And by the numbers illegals really do take more than they contribute. That’s a major danger on welfare programs—once you implement them it gives you the right and obligation to identify and surveil everyone to make sure those contributing get the benefit and that those who don’t aren’t stealing value they didn’t create.
Instead those funds were weaponized by opening the boarders to help 25+ years worth of illegals to enter in 4 years. So that they could vote in states who don’t require id and to see chaos, to turn elections to then and grow socialist voter base and government…
…to trample on the rights of Americans.
How else would you rapidly reverse this without doing what ICE is doing? Anytime you have law enforcement you have bad cops and casualties but when a burglar enters your home do you give them carte blanche to take your property because “something tragic might happen” or do you fight back because something tragic is being already underway?
Ps. Did you know that in the last year homicide, rape and robberies actually have plummeted?
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Making a weaponized force of masked Feds with NSA level surveillance tech who don’t have to abide by the 4th amendment is a monstrous idea in every circumstance except this one. It will definitely help here.