Probably not the author manipulating Primal’s top-zapped trending feed…

lots of privacy people follow her so could definitely be legit. also, i felt like the content is worth boosting even though it could possibly be a self-zap. the @npub18l3f...za55 content is manually curated by me with the help of a script i wrote that helps me find fat zaps to review.

also, @primal doesn't display anon zaps on notes, so not sure if they even count anon zaps in it's trending feed algo.

Could be legit. When I replied with that I had glanced at the Primal most-zapped feed and that note was at the top, but if Primal doesn’t count anon zaps then probably just coincidental.