> Because that is what you sound like to me. Incapable of actually evaluating anything critically, instead leaning on whatever fallacies let you stay the way you are instead of become interested in outside things.
lol. Didn’t you suggest I should only talk about your ideas.
I think we’re done, but good luck with your thing
Replies (2)
In some ways Nostr is already a “success”, given it’s a thriving ecosystem of people building outside the status quo
Do we have to put a definition on success? as relevant as it maybe for this discussion, it’s also limiting in its nature. Who knows what this might become!
I am still no clearer on why Johns original tweet story has any merit… ie Nostr can’t scale and can’t be censorship resistant at scale…
Nostr is a hot mess. Impossible to build anything robust and scalable (I tried, and failed it).
It would be - let's say 'scientific' - to understand and test a product, before dismissing it out of hand out of sheer butthurtness.
