That’s fine if Djuri wrote the code, mimic’d the Blockclock, and was making his code open source. It would be helpful if the end result didn’t look exactly like the original, I’d like to see something BETTER designed than the Blockclock. I’m not pissed about anything. I’m literally trying to decipher what the difference is between two projects that look very very identical. I already told you what I think about CK claiming source viewable vs FOSS. You interact like someone who has never had to ask a question before, humble yourself a little semisol

really bad adv for @DETERMINISTIC OPTIMISM 🌞 , after the "source viable drama" I see a pattern now. He's loosing respect and a client this time, and maybe many others are doing same thinking. This business move can be good with fiat sheeps, not with bitcoiners.

Yes, the code is fully independent from anything Coinkite has made.

Gotcha. Thanks for the info and that makes your OP about the situation make sense, thus much more alarming. Taking note on how this plays out and hope Djuri gets his project back up. Cheers

My wording was a bit harsh too and I understand. But overall, this is a pretty disappointing move from Coinkite. The full, unaltered text of the takedown notice is here: View quoted note →

Great synopsis of the situation. Appreciate your insights to challenge my own. 🤝