> if the problems of ledger privacy could be solved
Big if, still hasn't been solved. Monero is a sybil honeypot chain for larps that's less private from the state than Bitcoin simply because the anonset is shit and attracts lazy dumbs that can't do proper UTXO management.
> Tantalum-180m
Is there a decentralized ledger, near-costless verification, and most importantly, a deeply liquid market for this? Yes you could clone Bitcoin bit for bit today and have an equally scarce base unit, but the scarcity of the conception and resultant gravity-well cannot be replicated. Every shit-chain reinforces this, shit-chains are not scarce.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
> Is there a decentralized ledger
You were just arguing that ledger centralization in Lightning is absolutely okay, where everyone will use a custodial shitcoin version of Lightning and that’s fine because someone CAN transact in real Bitcoin. I don’t see how much different this is from “well, sure, the people issuing the gold-backed token COULD be lying about their gold reserves but that’s okay because you can have Krugerrands at home.”
I don’t buy this chain of argumentation, which is why I think Lightning is not the solution, and think we should give BIP300/BIP301 a shot at deossifying the base layer and see if they can make transacting Bitcoin at scale with asynchronous broadcasts work.