The dismissal of any charlie kirk stuff, and repeatedly using red herring logical fallacies (mainly surrounding the ballistics and the details of the "shooter") Most of the "conspiracy theories" surrounding that event don't mention either of those things. They're irrelevant if it was indeed a psyop fake shooting with a Hollywood blood squib in his shirt which pops before the "bullet" makes impact. The main video that's been used has been altered by ai, and the black dot that becomes the bullet hole moves around (clear to see when slowed down). Also no blood splatter, no blood in the parking lot on the way to the SUV (why were there no first responders anywhere, let alone ambulances? A concert around here in Texas with a few hundred people has that, and this was a college event with thousands) There are other past conspiracies he's hand waved but I can't remember which off the top of my head. Conviction on various topics has served him well (and the audience), but thinking you're always right and anyone who thinks differently is retarded is intellectually lazy. Just my 2 sats