Did Michael saylor get mentioned or did he communicate?

Mention is one thing. Context matters a lot though. Have not looked into it, I just think we should not be too quick to condemn.

This is what Gavin had to say

And you also have to consider the legitimacy of these emails.

Bryan Bishop....sheesh. Disappointing if true.

Apparently Saylor was “too creepy” to target 😂

hard to understand the upside of your posts here: Jeremy Rubin (MIT Media Lab / DCI) -Appears only by institutional association with MIT. -Epstein donated to MIT Media Lab broadly. -No emails, meetings, funding, or personal relationship involving Rubin. Amir Taaki -Name appears only as a historical Bitcoin figure reference. -No correspondence, meetings, funding, or institutional overlap. Gavin Andresen -Referenced as an influential Bitcoin developer. -No emails, meetings, funding, or relationship with Epstein. Austin Hill (Blockstream) -Appears in early Blockstream seed-era context as a company Epstein explored. -No evidence of meetings, solicitation, or Epstein investment. -No personal correspondence shown. Adam Back (Blockstream) -Named because of Blockstream, not personal contact. -No emails, meetings, funding, or relationship with Epstein. Brian Armstrong (Coinbase) -Mentioned in VC deal-flow emails where Epstein attempted access to Coinbase. -No emails to/from Armstrong. -No evidence Armstrong met Epstein or accepted capital. Bryan Bishop -Appears only as a technical / research name reference. -No emails, meetings, funding, or institutional ties. Michael Saylor -Referenced as a macro/tech figure. -No emails, meetings, funding, or relationship shown. -Any reference predates his Bitcoin involvement. (Above is AI assisted obviously.)