15 years ago, nostr:nprofile1qqsqyredyxhqn0e4ln0mvh0v79rchpr0taeg4vcvt64te4kssx5pc0spz3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wcq3camnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3dwfjkccte9emkcann9eehqctrv5x6d3yy advocated using bits (10⁻³ BTC) as Bitcoin's standard unit.
Today, nostr:nprofile1qqsgydql3q4ka27d9wnlrmus4tvkrnc8ftc4h8h5fgyln54gl0a7dgspz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqnxamnwvaz7tmwwa3juurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtmp09mx5mr9d9kx67psv9krw63jwpchgv35w9jkgvt6xasnsucmags4j is pushing to rename sats (10⁻⁸ BTC) and make them the standard.
In 15 years, someone will be arguing the same for msats (10⁻¹¹ BTC).
This is what winning looks like.
Login to reply
Replies (3)
msats don't exist.
Not on-chain, but higher: https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/blob/master/lnwire/msat.go?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Yes they do:
2.1 quintillion msats / ∞