I'm curious about something as I watch the debates around abortion: isn't Dobbs essentially good news? It allows the fight to be more local and for the people of each state to create laws that reflect their beliefs on abortion. There are folks who believe that abortion at any stage is murder; others who believe that no matter what it should be the woman's choice. These two are fundamentally incompatible view points; there's no reconciling them. But if abortion rights are decided at the state level we don't need to reconcile them. This is not an ideal situation (for either side) especially in the short term, but it seems a relatively reasonable solution for the country.

Replies (1)

It’s all politics and those in #btc or have #bitcoin and refuse to recognize that #politics **Are** people are missing a huge opportunity. Example: after Jan 6 : I **knew** Indiana would get hit first for abortion rights. Why? Cause that sellout veteran Senator Todd Young lacks character. He didn’t want to pass the #PACTACT either that benefited #veterans But I’ve met him in person so I’ve known for years he’s a **YES MAN** who will sell out to the highest bidder. So if you have a state House of Representatives that are mainly RED ( because it was stacked ) cause humans don’t work locally … this happens. Hence why I say to work locally ALL THE TIME. Sure you can argue the morality all you want but when people **BUY** their seats 💺 & don’t do anything about rape victims At one time Indiana had over 5000 untested rape kits ..: we have to pick our battles. 🛎️These two are fundamentally incompatible view points; there's no reconciling them. Multiple issues. I just cut the snakes down at the local level before they grow larger. Does that make sense to you? image