Consensus is the point. A soft fork without it isn't a soft fork, it's a hard sell. Bitcoin's immune system is its conservatism. That's not a bug, it's the whole reason any of us trust it.

Raising concerns about a consensus change and getting character-assassinated for it. Almost like the "open process" has an approved list of opinions.

“Pushed” as in what you dont like. “Without consensus” as in user consensus and miners not being required (i dont know Odell, someone might think you are lying) People exploit the network to put spam on the chain. You are okay with. People exploit to protect the network and you are not okay with. You gave no really rational reason. It signals personal interests and insensitive to a large amount of people you “insult” as a mob