OP_RETURN attack surface explainer:
https://opreturns.github.io/surface/
Login to reply
Replies (3)
Obfuscation punches a hole in the wall and stuffs it behind the drywall.
Both forms of abuse need to be targeted. UTXO bloat with spam is unacceptable as a long term reality.
Yep. And:
"Frankly, people have to be pretending that they lack the imagination to see the potential for the low cost of forever data amortized over eternity."
nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpdue4cn7qdct9ptfj0ndfrc469jnn49228al867m627ypas2f5j7qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qghwaehxw309aex2mrp0yh8qunfd4skctnwv46z7qpqf72uhqu9q3s4vg5pyfq2pa6att30z4y0w02z89jzrsmrks6sgllq2mvmky
Agree on your second point. Regarding UTXO bloat; Knots addresses the inscriptions hack, while Core refuses to patch and redefines things to call it a feature. BIP-444 further addresses this through consensus rules.