Really enjoying studying Hoppe's argumentation theory of ethics.
Quickest summary - "in order to be eligible to use arguments that I'm wrong (property rights), you first have to agree to the rules of what argument is, and once you do that, you're saying you're wrong".
Checkmate.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Axiomatic argumentation is quite difficult to refute. It's true because you agree to the premise.