I will try to simplify for you Mr Galt: 1) Kruse does a pod with Nat before his keynote address 2) Nat also does pod with Saylor 3) Kruse makes a case of bad actors within the bitcoin ecosystem orchestrating a spam attack, wolves in sheep clothing basically during his keynote 4) After his keynote, Nat allegedly then declined to release the pod both to Kruse and to the BTC Prague folks, with no explanation offered 5) Kruse reaches out to her and asks for a copy of the footage so that he releases it independently and that request too is declined 6) Saylor is allegedly one of the wolves and thus Nat is allegedly siding with the spammers. The end. Any qsns?
Replies (3)
I was referring more tauris claim about his own interactions with Natalie, not the kruse related situation. Specially as to his claim to know something important but not just spitting it out.
Just reposting something apologizing. I misread tauris post. I thought he was talking for himself but was relaying what kruse said. I posted an apology separately.
Kruse also claimed to have a recording of his own from the Brunel interview. Why does he want to release her copy? This guy is a primadonna. Why not just make another recording of the same material on his own? Does he really have his own recording of the interview? Is he afraid he won't remember the same story he came up with when he was with her, and she will expose him as a BS artist?
