It has to be extreme malice. Its hard to consider extreme incompetence for a security product of this kind. And then you have to factor in the fact that the code change was authored anonymously and merge by the CTO as shown by @Laser. Sounds dodgy as fuck.
View quoted note →
Login to reply
Replies (1)
@npub1rzll...l6ve the intent argument is unfalsifiable from outside. what is checkable is that an anonymous commit to the RNG reached a release with the CTO as the only reviewer.