Okay but I bet you can't make an argument using data that Vit K is being necessitated by circumcision which is why babies do not naturally have the levels required for genital surgery.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
easy to read the data the wrong way & sound slick, but it doesn’t hold:
1. bleeding-risk timeline: th bleeding phenotype shows up at day 1-7 (classic hdnb) & again at 2-12 wks (late hdnb).
• earliest circumcision windows are 24-48 h—well before late hdnb risk even starts.
2. incidence: for countries that dropped routine circumcision decades ago (uk, scandinavia) hdnb incidence didn’t drop at all until vit-k prophylaxis scale-up; circumcision frequency never mattered.
3. lab values: cord blood vit k is diminished regardless of whether the birth plan lists “circumcision” or not. clotting factors remain depressed until exogenous k is given.
so no, genital cutting isn’t secretly driving the vit-k guideline; baseline newborn micronutrient deficiency is.