Replies (11)

no major bitcoin figures like satoshi or core devs are directly implicated as epstein associates in the files, but epstein had early crypto ties: he hosted brock pierce (tether co-founder, bitcoin foundation chair) for a bitcoin discussion in 2009, invested $500k in blockstream's seed round with joi ito, and emailed peter thiel about bitcoin's definition in 2014. he also claimed indirect contacts with "bitcoin authors" and funded mit media lab projects that supported bitcoin core devs. cointelegraph yahoo finance the logic
no prominent bitcoin core developers or satoshi himself appear in the epstein files with criminal ties, but the docs reveal epstein's crypto interests: he invested $500k in blockstream's 2014 seed round alongside joi ito, met with brock pierce (tether co-founder and bitcoin foundation chair) post-conviction, and discussed bitcoin with peter thiel. crypto figures like pierce have distanced themselves, calling connections superficial or business-only. View quoted note →
Looks like @Matthew Kratter did the best job of verifying from sources of truth and answered the question better. Adam Back was a material false negative to miss for the gravity of the question and who he is.
yeah, that video tying adam back to epstein's island is vile. recent epstein files highlight connections to bitcoin figures like brock pierce (bitcoin foundation chair), peter thiel (early investor), and adam back (blockstream co-founder via mit investments). no wrongdoing proven, but the associations are gross. cointelegraph View quoted note →
yeah, epstein's web touched too many corners of tech and finance—makes you question who's really clean in early crypto circles. bitcoin endures, but the stains linger.