Why this was #unprecedented
Before Purdue:
1. Bankruptcy protection applied to the bankrupt entity
2. Not to wealthy owners who stayed solvent
Purdue tried to:
1. Use a company’s bankruptcy
2. To shield private individuals
3. From liability for mass harm
Lower courts allowed it.
Why?
1. Fear that without immunity, the Sacklers would walk away
2. States wanted the money now, not litigation later
3. Victims were fragmented, exhausted, and underfunded
This is #leverage , not #justice
Login to reply
Replies (1)
The Supreme Court moment
In June 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court finally said no.
You can’t buy immunity from mass death by routing money through a bankrupt company.