I too am still waiting for his technical arguments against BIP110, like ones to support two of his claims: it gives control to Luke and Mechanic, and Ocean is an attack on Bitcoin. If he’s right, I’d sincerely like to know.

Replies (2)

The attack is: supporting a fork without consensus; calling anyone who disagrees a pedo or captured; implied threats to devs or miners or even node runners that they will be legally liable for *illegal* non-financial data
Right? It’s like, if you’re gonna drop some claims like that you best back them up. But again he only responds to the obvious rage bait. If he doesn’t have a good argument, I’d respect him more if he just fucking said that.