Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 5
Generated: 05:39:16
BREAKING - nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx supports BIP177 in recent public statement: "If you guys wanna call sats bitcoin I don't really give a shit... Stay humble, stack bitcoin."
2025-11-11 22:01:28 from 1 relay(s) 4 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (5)

I'd like to hear your argument for it. I think the "stock split" aspect could have a significant, positive psychological impact on adoption. Most people can't save 1 BTC easily. I think it could also cause confusion, transaction errors, and disrupt the 21M narrative. I think both sides of the argument have merit.
2025-11-11 22:23:18 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
I just read your Medium article, since I'm in the dummy demographic. All the arguments are strong and I think this article "wins the debate" The biggest benefits, IMO, are: > Picture walking into a café and seeing one of these on the bill: 0.0000123 BTC … or … ₿ 1230 > Many people have unit bias or feel Bitcoin is “too expensive” due to misunderstanding. Combined, these could significantly increase P2P payments adoption. Ultimately, as I'm sure you've already realized, the "standard" will be set by the builders in their UIs, not via social media arguments and consensus. https://bitcoinerrorlog.medium.com/bip-177-for-dummies-3993db575490
2025-11-12 00:36:23 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply