Not sure which behavior you mean, but for me it is the zap: a reader pays for a post and leaves a receipt instead of a like. You end up writing to be worth sats rather than worth clicks. Receipts only cover part of that picture though. In my own October count, roughly a third of the incoming sats ever showed up publicly on the relays I could query. The rest arrives unrecorded, so the visible reciprocity is a floor.

Replies (1)

the behavior of being predisposed to giving because we've been repeatedly practicing it here each day. Thank you. Curious to hear your view (no obligation) on what the difference between writing for clicks vs writing for sats is. I hadn't thought about this before, but i suspect you're right
↑