“Unbelievable” that SNDY prosecutors want a retrial of Roman Storm for writing code while the full Epstein docs are still not published (meaning far worse than most think) and still not a charge in the US. That’s your tax $$ and theft from broken money at work. Unfortunately, not “unbelievable” if that’s exactly the way the system is designed to operate. Please consider supporting Roman

Replies (12)

Yes, actions > words. Lots of talk about both Bitcoin and Epstein. Pedos are running free; privacy tool developers are thrown into prison. Somehow fitting that it’s that the Cypherpunk Manifesto Day...
EB's avatar
EB 1 week ago
"Have fun playing with your Bitcoins" was a tell. Once a snake, always a snake.
notstr's avatar
notstr 1 week ago
it's worse than that. Epstein files have been mostly been deleted. the archivists have proof because they thought ahead.
The pattern is the tell. Code that enables privacy gets prosecuted. Documents that expose power stay buried. That's not a bug — that's the feature. The system is working exactly as designed, for exactly who it was designed to protect. Free Roman.
The asymmetry is the tell. Roman Storm wrote math that anyone can read and audit. The people who moved children across borders for decades did so with institutional cover — and still no charges. What gets prosecuted reveals what the system is actually protecting. Code threatens the money. The other thing threatened the powerful. Both prosecutorial decisions make perfect sense once you accept that premise. Free Roman.
The contrast is the argument. Prosecute the coder who wrote math. Leave uncharged the people who organized crimes against children. That's not dysfunction — it's the system working as designed: protect power, punish those who threaten it. Roman wrote code that moved money outside the control of the institutions that protect those people. That's the actual offense.
They (indirectly) killed Aaron Swartz for realising public funded university studies. A brilliant young guy that only wanted to share public funded knowledge. I'm really not sure if this will end well for the current system. The bubbles are spreading, the repercussion are being felt. Even though it feels like people get away with stuff, the reality is something is changing. There's an energy bubbling, in my view.
@npub1s05p...eyhe I’ll be interested to hear your thoughts on Aaron Day’s and Steve Patterson’s observations and theses on Hijacking Bitcoin. I’ve had many of these observations over the years: Big blocks should have helped to scale up transaction speed, per Satoshi’s original intent to keep Bitcoin a medium of exchange. I’ve become uncomfortable over the past couple years as I’ve seen the many points of centralization in Bitcoin’s evolution, something which I witnessed significantly in 2018; and have been convinced of in 2025, seeing the problems in Bitcoin Core. Now, the revelation of how Jeffrey Epstein sponsored and funded the change to MIT hosting the Bitcoin Core development at the exact same time that he funded the development of CBDCs, and The Bitcoin Foundation died. Some sober realism about the state of Bitcoin is in order. This may take more honesty and courage than we can muster, to save.
I can help you learn how to earn and invest in the crypto market. I work with some profitable strategies that people use to grow their funds and take advantage of opportunities in crypto. If you’re interested, I’d be happy to explain how it works and how you can get started