I think you offer more than the data you have access to. But most of your employability likely comes directly from the data you have access to. That’s why people who are considering hiring you want you to have relevant experience instead of 5 years of work as a Hunter gatherer.
Technically (and maybe relevantly) LLMs don’t actually have a search step. They just read some text and then continue it in ways that are reinforced by its training. So they aren’t searching and copying and pasting. They are studying humanity, and providing you a mirror of it according to your prompt. Feel free to ask for the average mirror, or the genius mirror, and put it to work.
Today they make surprising mistakes, but there doesn’t seem to be a reason to think that they always will. I mean even today if you have it do some self-criticism on what it’s beginning to think it often corrects mistakes. And that’s without a vastly smarter model. Seems like vastly smarter models are possible and coming.
View quoted note →
Login to reply
Replies (1)
There is nothing smart about them. They analyze data they have access to. Silicon and software do not have cognition. If it is fed nothing but sports stats, it cannot return results about cooking.