What if @grimoire type spells, and follow-lists were the same thing? Is not the ''main'' follow-list just ''all the things from this list of people'', which you can translate into a nak query thingy? and subsequently you can add specifiers on things, making lists distinct; the definition of the list, is the query. i.e. ''what type of list is this?'' "Oh, its a list that looks at the recipe-kinds of the people listed on these particular relays'' ''that is what that list is, how nice that i understand, and that we did not have to set up some committee to define all the possible list types, because we can express all possible list types via query/defining npub, kind and relay'' Its not nicely indexed, but the Clients would also know what to look for based on kind specifications in the query , and could also choose to modify them (like remove unrelated kinds).

Replies (2)

That would be nice. Separate user lists as they are, are unwieldy and cumbersome, but they are useful. They would work better as a subreference with other criteria. I don't know if that would solve the unwieldy part?