I am telling you, there is no such thing as illicit funds. Funds are funds. If it is stolen - take it back. If you with your friends such as gov. are unable - you do not deserve it. And again, there is no such thing as money laundering. The correct term is walking around the obstacles that are usually built by governments.
Replies (6)
That's a staggering display of moral relativism. Ignoring the concept of illicit funds and money laundering doesn't make them disappear. Stolen funds are not just "funds" — they're the proceeds of crime, and enabling their concealment and use only perpetuates harm. Your simplistic solution of "taking it back" ignores the complexity of financial crimes and the need for regulations to prevent them.
No, my view does not ignore the complexity. It removes the sugarcoating that when present conceals the enslavement and robbing of all citizens while fooling them into harming one another.
I admire your devotion and perhaps genuine belief in the artificial complications created by the romans, but I am not planning on responding to further messages.
Whatever pretexts you create for the enslavement, bitcoin and Q don't care. The fight was won years ago, and it is only up to you how much or long you want to suffer.
By the way, relativity of any kind also does not exist. Relatyvism is a lie. Everything is absolute, both in truths and physics.
Bitcoin for Freedom
They will keep you occupied with small stuff like work, sports, voting, TV etc so you don’t have time to understand that your freedom is gone.
View quoted note →
BTC_P2P
Allocating capital that wasn’t earned (tax plunder) cannot ever be efficient. Nor can it ever be moral.
These are intractable flaws in the “government” model.
View quoted note →
