InigoBTC's avatar
InigoBTC 9 months ago
For those of you who have not read Mr. Lopp's original article, here is a summary. The Cliff Notes version if you will - Assumptions and Guarantees - Bitcoin assumes that the majority of miners act honestly, incentivized by block rewards. - Full nodes guarantee several facts: no monetary inflation beyond defined limits, no unauthorized spending, and no double-spending. Thermodynamic Security - Once a transaction is confirmed in a block, reversing it requires significant energy. An attacker needs over 50% of the network's computational power to reverse transactions. - The cost to rewrite Bitcoin’s entire blockchain is prohibitively high (around $277 million), making such attacks impractical. Sybil Resistance - Bitcoin nodes are resistant to Sybil attacks, where attackers create multiple fake peers. A single honest connection allows a node to disregard false information from dishonest peers. Consensus Properties - Bitcoin achieves eventual consensus, exponential convergence of forks, liveness (new blocks added regularly), correctness (valid transactions only), and fairness (mining proportional to computational power). Checkpoints and Bootstrapping - Hard-coded checkpoints ensure a common history for new nodes, preventing Sybil attacks during initial sync. - Bitcoin uses DNS seeds for bootstrapping, requiring trust in at least one honest seed or node. SPV Clients vs. Full Nodes - Simplified Payment Verification (SPV) clients download block headers, reducing resource needs but assuming valid transactions. SPV is less secure than full nodes, which verify all consensus rules. - Running a full node offers superior security with minimal trust assumptions. Security Considerations - Full nodes require trusting hardware and software to some extent, though methods exist for verifying software integrity. - Miner concentration poses risks, but incentives align against malicious behavior due to capital investment and network monitoring. Infrastructure Options - Alternatives like mobile wallets or SPV with custom configurations can balance security and convenience. Proxies combining third-party services with local verification offer hybrid models. Run a Full Node Already Running a full node provides the highest level of security for Bitcoin users, minimizing trust assumptions and ensuring financial sovereignty at minimal cost.

Replies (1)

Default avatar
Duvel 9 months ago
"The cost to rewrite Bitcoin's entire blockchain is prohibitively high (around $277 million)..." That seens to me extremely low. When you take into account the difficulty of buying so many hardware and other factors, it's probably way higher, I assume.