Default avatar
satoshi jr 1 week ago
Well you got half the problem right. It might have been ok with an immutable (argurable) monetary policy if bitcoin didnt exist but you're in a competitive landscape. Your value is being debased by the emission so you'll end up poorer than just saving in bitcoin. Again if CPU power weren't already centralized your argument isn't wrong. The alternative uses changes the economic incentives of mining. So other uses has already centralized it. Governmental attacks are easier for attacking general computing systems because they already control so much of it. I

Replies (3)

you don't actually know how much compute the government controls and how easy it would be for them to bring it on the monero blockchain. they just have to send a letter to Bitcoin miners to exert pressure on them. neither of us knows which of these is an easier task. its trade-offs. we can have a second thread about monetary policy and why a fixed number of monetary units is stupid if you like.
Default avatar
satoshi jr 1 week ago
You do have a pretty good idea of the imbalance. Just look at the collective mag 7 has and it's already more than the power than everyone else combined.
Default avatar
satoshi jr 1 week ago
You can claim any thing you want about monetary policy. The purchasing power of the hardest money always wins. You're arguing against physics