Obviously you aren't reading what I write so, good luck with your spam. I will run the code I want to with filters.

if every node policy is useless why do they exist?

And your UTXO set will continue to bloat as spammers fill the chain. Won't be me spamming but it will bloat nonetheless.

Legacy script problems from what I can tell. Or @Luke Dashjr might know. Otherwise we deduce it from code and comments.

he speaks in a "technical context" because thats the language his handlers have allotted him to strawman the issue. #bitcoin is for bitcoin. which is money. the rest is fucking noise and attack.

Boolean logic is a pretty simple language.

"Standardness rules exist for three main reasons. The first is as DoS protection. Your peers on the P2P network are not identified and some transactions are more expensive than others to process. An asymmetry between the cost of sending you an unconfirmed transaction (which is very small) and the cost for you to process it creates a DoS vector. Another reason for standardness rules is to provide upgrade hooks for soft forks. Invalidating a type of transactions in a soft fork that was already non-standard for a while gives more guarantees that a non-upgraded miner won’t include a newly-invalid transaction in a block, making soft forks significantly safer to roll out. Finally, standardness rules have also been used as a way to nudge behaviour toward a less harmful approach, or to mildly deter certain activities. For instance by standardizing OP_RETURN outputs, or discouraging data storage back when blocks were not full."

Antoine Poinsot

On relay policy and recent OP_RETURN drama

Relaxing restrictions on OP_RETURN is fine. Bitcoiners need to stop being so gullible.