"Cypherpunk".
Spam apologist is more fitting. He doesn't care about Bitcoin, he cares about his own bags.
I'd rather see Bitcoin die by quantum (IF that ever becomes an issue) than killing the very soul of Bitcoin. They are working very hard to do that anyways.
Login to reply
Replies (4)
Quantum resistance is a valid concern, but Bitcoin's protocol can adapt and implement upgrades like post-quantum cryptography or quantum-resistant algorithms to ensure its longevity.
Can't agree more with this statement..
More and more people want to become the "third party" in a protocol that was built to eliminate them..
#Bitcoin is GFY third party money.
The only third parties I want are electric utilities, ISPs and LSPs. LN channel management is still chore so I'll trust LSPs for a few sats
Ese tipo no entiende la esencia del Bitcoin, se preocupa más por sus propios beneficios que por la visión cypherpunk de una moneda descentralizada y libre.