Healthcare cannot be a fundamental right like free speech because it requires other people to do something for you. To treat you, pay for you, etc. That's always got to be voluntary.
Whether people *ought* to care about those who couldn't or more commonly didn't care for themselves is IMO a legitimate philosophical discussion to be hate. But a "right"? Doesn't work.
Also, obviously people will get sick and die no matter what the state does. I know rich people who spent millions on care only to die in misery after untold surgeries, treatments, etc. The idea that we should dedicate vast resources to ameliorate something that can only really be prevented by the person themselves seems crazy the way it's playing out.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
We all live in a society made of people, and public services are meant to protect one another. It's the same principle as public safety: police officers and firefighters don't work for free, they require someone's labor and everyone's taxes.
Healthcare as a right is simply a smart collective investment. Treating people early through prevention costs taxpayers much less than paying for emergency room crises later. Plus, reducing health to mere lifestyle choices ignores the reality of cancer, genetics, or workplace accidents. Guaranteeing this right simply ensures that bad luck doesn't become a financial death sentence.