Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 1
Generated: 21:00:35
I can grant you, it wasn't regular. For 2 reasons, one I mentioned before, and they are related to each other: 1. Other to store data are cheaper 2. There was no economic demand to do this in OP_RETURN No economic demand is the only scenario where filters work. If there is economic demand, filters do nothing Now, it would actually be BETTER for the health of the network/noderunners If shitcoins/jpgs moved to use OP_RETURN instead of witness: 1. OP_RETURNs can be only up to 1mb, not 4mb 2. OP_RETURN consumes less resources than alternatives 3. Alternatives produce unspendable UTXOs, which grow UTXO set - the absolute worst outcome for node runners So by preferring (because you cannot stop it) witness/inscriptions instead of OP_RETURN you choose a result that has 0 effect if there is any economic demand, but harms all node runners and the network much more than OP_RETURNs So much for protecting node runners
2025-11-04 22:26:21 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (1)

Did I tell you, you are spam supporter? This exact BS led to the porn video in OP_RETURN and will lead to much more spam. You just excused spam instead of realizing from the given EVIDENCE that OP_RETRUN filters worked and kept OP_RETURNs less than 83 Bytes. The only way to add it was a miner directly to add it to a block which was more expensive and they are obligated to filter out CSAM. BIP444 can fix consensus too in addition to the filters.
2025-11-04 22:33:49 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply