Constant's avatar
Constant 2 weeks ago
Today i realized that we could benefit from better framing Nostr to content creators. I think that comparing it to the platforms that they use is pointless. They are on these platforms because a general audience is there, as well that it allows to monetize their work. From this perspective, Nostr simply is not an alternative, and won't be for a long time. Yet, a lot of content creators, especially those that feel the censorship pressure/vulnerability for whatever reason, tend to eventually cultivate their own website as a fall-back. They understand that their website ''can't'' (it can but probably won't) be taken away from them, they value this autonomy. Some content creators do this from the get-go and after a very long grind get to a point where their audience generally manages to go to their site to the point that they are sustainable just off of their website alone, regardless of what their fate on these platforms is. THIS, is where Nostr is just 1000x times better. Not for those that already managed to do the multi-year grind of teaching their audience to visit their site. For them Nostr is still better, but their need is simply not that high. Any of these content creators, with a single prompt in shakespeare or whatever, can get a website that is actually just a passive Nostr client that pulls their notes/content automatically. It is what i did with . The site is essentially 0 maintenance now, all i have to do is publish stuff via Nostr. This flow by itself is already better than maintaining a regular website. On top of that, they get the added benefit that if any of audience uses Nostr, that audience never has to go to their website in the first place, they just get the content regardless of what app they use. I think comparing Nostr to running your own website is a far better pitch for these people, because it avoids the comparison with the platforms, which is a comparison Nostr just simply looses. Yet these content creators still bother to create their own site for censorship resistance/autonomy reasons, and that is where we have a far better story. Nostr.

Replies (11)

Noah Fischer's avatar
Noah Fischer 2 weeks ago
You're right that comparing Nostr to mainstream platforms misses the point—it's not about audience size yet, but about uncensorable infrastructure for at-risk creators. I was just reading about Israel's strike on Iran's nuclear site and how both states maneuver around censorship; independent journalists covering this need Nostr-style fallbacks.
Constant's avatar
Constant 2 weeks ago
I mean, on the one hand, sure, we probably need loads of things. But does your run of the mill content-creator-home-website have any of that fancy-pancy-piewpiew-laz0r-backflip-360noscope stuff? Or is it just a webpage with videos and/or audiofiles people click and watch/listen? Both satellite.earth and azzamo.media paid blossomservers seem to load my stuff just fine/quickly inside all the nostr apps. Although @Azzamo would have to change their scheme, because the upload sizes/total storage allowed under many of the tiers just does not fit my usecase of having only a hand full of long video presentations.
GJM's avatar
GJM 2 weeks ago
Good food for thought. Thank you.
Constant's avatar
Constant 2 weeks ago
well yeahno. They are cool, don't get me wrong, but they assume you are inside Nostr to begin with, and want to subsequently get a site going. Whereas my whole point is that people could run what is by the looks of it a regular DNS website, but is actually Nostr in the back-end.
Constant's avatar
Constant 2 weeks ago
Totally not the point, not even a bit. A.I. makes website creation trivial, if you don't like A.I. you do it by hand, fine, completely irrelevant
It's not irrelevant if you want to attract content creators and a lot of content creators don't like AI. And the reason they don't like it is because a lot of AI's been trained on the content they create. Surely you know this?
Constant's avatar
Constant 2 weeks ago
nothing i talked about was actually about A.I., not a single thing. For some reason you tripped over the mention of shakespeare and are determined to get stuck on it, incapable of seeing its irrelevance to the point i was making. So i don't see the added value in continuing this interaction. I hope for your sake some day your reading comprehension improves, have a nice day.