I naturally stand on the side of the reasonable man who hates garbage on the blockchain and also any technical means that will lead to it. And I still refuse your argument ๐Ÿ˜ It's like if a law is passed allowing the government to imprison people for no apparent reason (but we know THAT would never happen for real...) and nobody bats an eye, but when an additional law permits the government to also spit on the face of said unjustly imprisoned individuals, everyone loses their minds.

Replies (1)

On one hand I see what you mean and it makes total sense, on the other it makes also sense to oppose a second step that builts on a previosuly rejected step. But most of all, if you don't acknoledge that this last change makes things different (namely that it takes away friction and exposes node operator to more legal risks) then our discussion cannot go forward, because these 2 facts is what our disagreement rests on
โ†‘