Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 1
Generated: 00:36:36
You could have paid more in fees if you wanted to secure a spot in the mempool. Its all about whether you want to pay more to be first or be patient waiting while paying less. They accept my transactions just fine, I just offer a bit more in fees to get my stuff included in the block. Claiming its the fault of "spam" either shows you don't know how Bitcoin and fee markets work or you are just blinded by whatever Knots propaganda was presented to you. Also Core nodes don't have filters for blocking Knots nodes. It is the other way around Knots has the function to block OP_RETURN transactions which is actively censoring transactions that are valid to the chain. My transactions were also just UTxO consolidation as well and it still got into the block. I just had to offer more coins in return to get a spot in the block.
2025-10-19 07:58:14 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (1)

I think his point was just that the amount of spam competing with financial transactions will increase due to the changes in v30 laying out the red carpet for spammers. Miners don’t care - they mine what’s most profitable for them and have unfortunately degraded into centralized short-term incentivized participants in the ecosystem. If spam ever gets so bad that financial transactions are prohibitively expensive, that’s really bad for Bitcoin. Not everything can live on Layer 2 or sidechains - sometimes we need financial transactions on the base layer. Corporate miners are fine killing the goose that lays the golden eggs as long as they hit the quarterly earnings forecasts and the executives get their bonuses at the end of the year. They’ll transform into AI hosting companies if Bitcoin dies. That’s why node runners need to push back against this Core v30 nonsense and make Bitcoin about money again.
2025-10-20 00:16:16 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply