I believe there is no compelling reason to remove the 'Reactive' softfork deployment method on the pretense of building consensus. Quite the opposite, the existence of the 'Reactive' option acts as an additional lever, actually leading to greater consensus.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
I think the same. Stop making compromises with clearly bad actors.
Perhaps he compromise is not as much for the bad actors as it is for more of the middle?
I dunno...