I was looking at the malicious intent through both sides.
On core:
moving and deprecating a feature for users that their base are clearly are divided on, just feels like bad mgmt.
On Knots:
Dividing a community on the premises of CSAM.
My own 2 sats:
Although possible today we donβt need more ways to spam even if they are more expensive and still require other software to extract.
On luke personally donβt know the guy but this community is full of special folks π
Would love a platform that kinda prevents us all from getting too tribal on these cases ( a man can dream )
Login to reply
Replies (1)
I think nostr actually does a really good job at that - its really become my happy place on the internet where i can choose what I see and engage however and how frequently i like as opposed to some nefarious algorithm deciding for me.
I agree re core to a degree as Im not versed enough on how harmful these currently workarounds are that are being used. I do think that a lot could have been mitigated by explaining these things clearly (Realizing that I have a media platform and that I could also do smth about that instead of complaining).
What I do think an interesting and very overlooked question in the spam debate is is who qualifies what counts as spam, and I find that a slippery slope - kind of like qualifying who a terrorist is.
Today it may be JPEGs, tomorrow it could be a rollup, etc.