Sorry, but it really makes sense to compare both:
It's again another power grab trying to build support using same kind of arguments (FUD) against Core.
Login to reply
Replies (3)
And when I say FUD, I'm referring to things like:
This post is about the next decade or two, not the next 24 hours.
Core and Bitcoin cannot both continue to exist.
View quoted note →
Let's see:
- Increasing the OP_Return limit is NOT such a 'major change'. It doesn't affect consensus. It's not even a soft fork.
- People wanting to store something in Bitcoin's blockchain already do it. Nothing is changing that.
- Making the p2p network to relay totally valid consensus transactions actually improves its decentralisation.
- The 'social consensus' you talk about just lives in your head.
- Arguing about 'potential future changes' is just FUD
- Don't like a client? Run whatever client you prefer. It's up to you.
- Luke is indeed positioning himself as bitcoin-saviour and leader. I've seeing this movie with other protagonists and it didn't end well for them.
🫂
*typo: "I've seen" (not 'seeing')